The Insane Logic of Stupid Socialists
The greatest battle throughout mankind’s history is being fought between INDIVIDUALISM and COLLECTIVISM- or CAPITALISM versus COMMUNISM AND FASCISM! But the socialist idiots don’t just get it…
It’s already proven: all socialists, communists, Marxists, collectivists, and neo-liberals are irrational. They all reject reason,
According to stupid socialists: Fascism is what we call it!
science, logic, and individual rights.
The fall of Soviet Russia in 1989 is the best proof that communism is one of the greatest lies and abominations concocted by two irrational mystics at a time when science, reason and freedom were not yet fully discovered— Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. That the communist ‘utopia’ envisioned by these two collectivist mystics is about a realm with no government, no classes, no religion, no property, no police is nothing but a sickening fantasy especially dreamed up for the indolent, the lazy fanatics of common good and welfare statism, and the people with deranged mentality and concept of reality.
However, there are those who seek to pursue Karl Marx’s communist utopia—those brainless fanatics of collectivism who have accepted the evil gospels of their communist ancestors and Marxist mentors on faith and not on reason—and they try to achieve their communist utopian agenda by creating lies and propaganda campaigns designed to distort the people’s perception of reality.
In order to paint those who are opposed to their evil political ideology as a bunch of violent and power-seeking individuals, they now use the term FASCISM, a word with specific and objective meaning. They argue that the opposite of socialism and communism is fascism without even trying to understand the real concept and nature of the latter. They try to label those who refuse to agree with their stupid collective mentality as supporters of fascism and as neo-Nazi admirers of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini.
“The fascists of the future will be called anti–fascists.” — Winston Churchill
But in truth and in reality, the dishonest and desperate propaganda of these communist fanatics only unleashes them as nothing but a herd of ignoramus, idiotic, and blind followers of the cult of collectivism and Marxism.
Let us define our terms. Fascism is defined as a “radical and authoritarian national political ideology,” while communism is defined as “ a social structure in which classes are abolished and property commonly controlled, as well as a political philosophy and social movement that advocates and aims to create such a society.” On the other hand, capitalism is “an economic system where capital and land, the non-labor factors or production, are privately owned; labor, goods and resources are traded in markets; and profits, is distributed to the owners invested in technologies and industries.” But the correct definition of capitalism is this: it is a social system solely founded on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned. The aforementioned definitions of communism, fascism and capitalism show that these three terms have their own distinct concept or attributes.
Let me establish the following points to demolish the fallacious claim of most stupid advocates of communism in this country:
- Communism, fascism, and capitalism are three terms with distinct meaning, concept, or definition.
- Fascism and capitalism do not have the same meaning and concept. In fact they are opposites.
- Fascism is about “radical and authoritarian” rule of a political despot, while capitalism is a political system that respects individual rights and recognizes the application of objective laws and legal principles.
- Communism is a collectivist political ideology that rejects individual rights, subjugates the individual to the collective, and regards man as the means to the ends of others or the state. Capitalism is the recognition that the individual is an end in himself and not the means to the ends of others.
- Communism and fascism are both a collectivist ideology.
For the benefit of those who embrace reason and who are still willing to think and to use their mind, let me lay down the similarities between Communism and Fascism. They are as follows:
- Both communism and fascism reject the concept of individual rights. Both regard the individual as the means to the ends of others. Capitalism does the opposite.
- Both communism and fascism are collectivist ideologies.
- Both communism and fascism are a form of totalitarian rule or dictatorship. Any individual may be sacrificed or immolated for the sake of common good, public welfare, or whatever the majority or the dictator deems as ‘practical’ or ‘necessary’ for the sake of the good of the majority or the state.
- Both communism and fascism negate the concept of private property. If communism regards private property as nonexistent, fascism regards private property as a political privilege that may only be given to a special class or group of people (e.g., cronies, czars, etc.)
- Both communism and fascism regard that political power may only be achieved through bloody revolution or class struggle.
- Both communism and fascism are racist ideologies. Karl Marx regarded the capitalist people or states as “racial trash”, while Adolf Hitler considered the Jews and ethnic minorities as lower forms of animal.
- Both communism and fascism are enemies of capitalism.
- Both communism and fascism consider the fact that killing is necessary to achieve their respective political or utopian goal.
Here’s the dirty, dishonest and desperate propaganda of the most passionate advocates of communism and their lesser minions: they try to LUMP or PUT TOGETHER those who oppose their socialist/communist utopian vision as supporters or advocates of fascism. This crooked political trick is one of the most visible trademarks of every Marxist. This was perfectly applied by Stalin to protect himself against his own paranoia during his dark days in power. Stalin’s paranoia resulted in the death of more than 20 million of his own people, including members of his army, intellectuals, and dissenters. This was also applied by Hitler to eradicate the communists in Germany in order to achieve his totalitarian goal.
What these stupid supporters of the evil ideology of communism refuse to grasp is that the real battle between good and evil is INDIVIDUALISM versus COLLECTIVISM. There is only one individualist political and economic ideology on earth: CAPITALISM. All the rest are collectivist ideologies, such as communism, socialism, Nazism, fascism, theocracy, etc.
How do we know whether a political ideology is a collectivist ideology? The test is very simple. Does it regard the individual as the means to the ends of others or the state? Does it consider every individual as property of the state that can be sacrificed or immolated for the sake of common good? If the answer to these questions is Yes, then such a political system is a form of collectivism.
Now the following Nazi or Fascist quotations are the best proof that Fascism, like communism, is a form of collectivism, and an enemy of capitalism and individual rights:
“We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions.” —Adolf Hitler
“[S]ocialism is sacrificing the individual to the whole.” —Joseph Goebbels, the top propagandist of the Nazi party
“The concept of personal liberties of the individual as opposed to the authority of the state had to disappear; it is not to be reconciled with the principle of the nationalistic Reich. There are no personal liberties of the individual which fall outside of the realm of the state and which must be respected by the state. The member of the people, organically connected with the whole community, has replaced the isolated individual; he is included in the totality of the political people and is drawn into the collective action. There can no longer be any question of a private sphere, free of state influence, which is sacred and untouchable before the political unity. The constitution of the nationalistic Reich is therefore not based upon a system of inborn and inalienable rights of the individual.”
—Ernst Rudolf Huber, official spokesman for the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, 1939
“THE COMMON INTEREST BEFORE SELF-INTEREST.”
—NDSAP Program, Point 24, 1920
“We must rouse in our people the unanimous wish for power in this sense, together with the determination to sacrifice on the altar of patriotism, not only life and property, but also private views and preferences in the interests of the common welfare.”
—Friedrich von Bernhardi, 1912
“The worker in a capitalist state—and that is his deepest misfortune—is no longer a living human being, a creator, a maker. He has become a machine. A number, a cog in the machine without sense or understanding. He is alienated from what he produces.”
—Joseph Goebbels, 1932 pamphlet
“‘Private property’ as conceived under the liberalistic economic order … represented the right of the individual to manage and to speculate with inherited or acquired property as he pleased, without regard for the general interests … German socialism had to overcome this ‘private,’ that is, unrestrained and irresponsible view of property. All property is common property. The owner is bound by the people and the Reich to the responsible management of his goods. His legal position is only justified when he satisfies this responsibility to the community.”
—Ernst Rudolf Huber, official Nazi Party spokesman, 1939
Hitler’s Nazi Party against Capitalism:
“We German National Socialists have recognized that not international solidarity frees the peoples from the ties of international capital, but the organized national force. …The National Socialist German Workers’ Party asks you all to come … to a GIANT DEMONSTRATION against the continued cheating of our people by the Jewish agents of the international world stock-exchange capital.”
—Nazi Poster, 1921
“It is not to save capitalism that we fight in Russia … It is for a revolution of our own. … If Europe were to become once more the Europe of bankers, of fat corrupt bourgeoisies … we should prefer Communism to win and destroy everything. We would rather have it all blow up than see this rottenness resplendent. Europe fights in Russia because it [i.e., Fascist Europe] is Socialist. …what interests us most in the war is the revolution to follow …The war cannot end without the triumph of Socialist revolution.”
—Leon Degrelle, leading National Socialist figure, speaking on behalf of the Nazi SS in occupied Paris, 1943
“[W]e will do what we like with the bourgeoisie. … We give the orders; they do what they are told. Any resistance will be broken ruthlessly.”
—Adolf Hitler, 1931
“The internal and international criminal gang will either be forced to work or simply exterminated.”
—Adolf Hitler, 1931
“Today I will once more be a prophet. If the international Jewish financiers, inside and outside Europe, succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevisation of the earth, and thus the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe!”
—Adolf Hitler, 1939
RELATED VIDEO:
THE VINCENTON POST 
so capitalism is the only way to go?
It is the only way to go and it is the most moral and the most practical political and economic system on earth. Capitalism to the hardcore, stupid socialists is whatever they call it. Like communism or socialism, capitalism has exact, objective meaning. If the socialists had any brains, they’d know that capitalism and fascism are opposites, and Hitler considered capitalism the enemy of Nazism or fascism.
but capitalism hasn’t worked out too well either man…just look at the usa.
USA is not a capitalist society. FYI, it is a mixed economy bordering on dictatorship. This is my NTH TIME to address this lie being perpetuated by the neo-liberals and mindless socialists.
Is it proper to blame capitalism for these horrible results of government intervention and corruption? Capitalism is based on that French slogan “laissez-nous faire,” which means “let us alone.” It is wrong and improper to ascribe the ongoing economic crisis to Capitalism. For decades, Capitalism has been vilified, attacked and distorted by the New Left or the Liberals and the Conservatives. Over the past few months, the Obama administration massively expanded the scope and power of the executive branch by creating dozens of government Czars, which include health czar, regulatory czar, among others. They authorized the semi-private Federal Reserve to print more than 2 trillion US dollars (although there were reports that it reached $5 trillion) out of nothing! This really massive bailout money was used to rescue financially troubled banks and companies which were mismanaged. — https://fvdb.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/statistm-a-love-story/
Here’s the real concept and attributes of laissez faire capitalism:
1) it is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned.
2) it means a full, pure, uncontrolled, unregulated laissez-faire capitalism—with a separation of state and economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of state and church.
3) its moral justification does not lie in the altruist claim that it represents the best way to achieve “the common good.”
4) it is a system wherein all human relationships are voluntary, and that men are free to cooperate or not, to deal with one another or not, as their own individual judgments, convictions, and interests dictate. — https://fvdb.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/capitalism-and-imperialism-are-contradiction-in-terms/
Statist policies and government interventionist programs are not part of capitalism. They are characteristics of SOCIALISM. That’s why if you’re following the news, the socialist dictator of Venezuela Hugo Chavez called Obama a socialist for nationalizing big companies like GM. http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=3302
Yes look at the U.S.A The richest most powerful nation on earth. The nation that has had more inventions in the last century then any socialist country out there. Capitalism promotes inventiveness. Computer, tv, internet, airplane, assembly line nuclear power to name a few. If you look at the history of the U.S.A since its founding it has been one of nothing but growth.
The only reason we are having the problems we are now is because of the liberals and their socialist programs tearing down the government. Look at welfare. Lets take taxes from the hard worker and give it to the lazy non worker. What a stupid idea. The lazy non worker is going to sit back and do nothing to improve himself or the country. The hard worker will wonder why his neighbor the lazy non worker is benefiting from his hard work and will eventually stop working and join the lazy non worker.
Hell our current economic crises is traced back to the liberal program that let people who couldn’t afford expensive houses to buy these houses for low monthly payments. Then the program ended, the rent tripled and everyone who couldn’t afford to buy the house in the first place had to foreclose. All these forecloses caused the banks to fall. The banks falling caused the businesses to close. Now there are 10 million people out of work and we are in a recession. All because of 1 little socialist program to let everyone be equal and own a house even though they couldn’t afford it.
Capitalism works. Look at HK, Singapore, Japan, and Germany(a former Socialist state)
What happened to USA? Capitalism in USA? That’s news to me… Does excessive government regulation of the economy mean capitalism to you?
The USA when created was based on these principles. over time, as it will always happen no matter what system we have, people get corrupted. I feel capitalism is messed up too man because in today’s world, it will always represent a money dominated society and that will more often than not, lead to problems.
However, I do agree that most of what Obama has done seems like a move towards socialism.
so tell me my friend, in a pure, uncontrolled, unregulated laissez faire system, how would you deal with issues such as guns, pedafelia etc, do you believe that people are smart enough to live unregulated?
Read my entries HERE.
Better to be free dangerously then a slave in safety. Guns are harmless, it is violent nature that needs dealt with in society thru law. Abuse of children can be punished away if law is willingly enforced by power. Force and or willingness is missing. Weapons are never the issue or the solution. Dealing with nature is dealing in reality.
Great read. I agree with almost everything except this
“Both communism and fascism are racist ideologies. Karl Marx regarded the capitalist people or states as “racial trash”, while Adolf Hitler considered the Jews and ethnic minorities as lower forms of animal.”
I quote Ayn Rand regarding if all Fascism was racist “Not necessarily. Hitler’s Germany did; Mussolini’s Italy did not”
And with regards to Communism, Communism per se is not Racist, Latinos in South America and Black people in Africa have both tried it out, Marxism does not discriminate, whether your black or white they’ll kill you. They have equal hatred for all living things.
@ Joshua. I’m speaking of Communism as conceptualized by Karl Marx. Have you forgotten his gospel about “racial trash”?
Karl Marx maybe a racist, but Communism per se is not a “racist ideology”. Racism is not an essential part of it, same for Fascism.
My oh my, if capitalism is all about the self or individual, then a government would not certainly exist. Why? Because the hell people would care about others. Being individualistic means you only think about yourself and care less of what might happen to others if they did something. Wouldn’t that result to chaos?
And because capitalism is all about the self or individual, then the government would not be able to perform its supposedly duty to protect individual rights. Why? Because it will be filled with selfish people. Everything would just be about the rise of oneself. Get the point?
This is very disturbing.
My goodness! Do you even know what’s your talking about? It’s your utter ignorance that’s “DISTURBING” you, kid.
My goodness! Do you even know what’s your talking about? It’s your utter ignorance that’s “DISTURBING” you, kid. Sang lupalop ka ba galing?!
Where did I came from? I came from the real world unlike you busy living in your dream land. 😀
So how do you define individualistic? Maybe you’ve got a better definition than what I have. Please do share. 🙂
Capitalism is good but most of the capitalists in the world are GREEDY! Because of the capitalism, major resources not only in our country had been abused my most of the capitalists! Capitalism teaches us to be MATERIALISTIC and LUXURIA! Sino ba nagpa-uso ng mga pornography? Si Marx ba? XD
sino ba talaga ang mga walang utak? Anong mga bansa ba ang gumagamit ng relihiyon para yumaman? Socialist country ba? Anong bansa ba ang naglalaan ng malalaking pondo para sa mga nuclear bomb? Anong bansa kaya ang naglalaan ng malalaking pera sa mga walang kakwenta-kwentang bagay? Sa halip na ipantulong sa mga mahihirap para makapagsimula at bumangon sa kahirapan, wala! Anong bansa ba ang nakaimbento ng sigarilyo? Sa halip na ang itanim sa mga taniman ng tabako ay gulay at prutas, e di sana walang nagugutom! SINO NGAYON ANG WALANG UTAK??? MGA GANID NA KAPITALISTA, TAMA??? Magpapakamatay ako kung hindi KAPITALISTA si Lucio Tan!
You say USA is not Capitalist, but it is the idea that it carries. What happened in USA is an example of what could go wrong in Capitalism. This is the same thing with Russia before. You think they are Communist? You think the proletariat, the workers, have control over the means of production? They don’t! They never were Communist. What happened to them is an example of what could go wrong with Communism. Check your thoughts brother. You are confusing the essentials with the accidentals.
Better know the meaning of capitalism. I have extensively discussed capitalism in this category… https://fvdb.wordpress.com/advocacy-capitalism/
And I have commented why America experiences crisis here, and it’s because of too much government– https://fvdb.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/statistm-a-love-story/
Your Capitalism brought Oligarchy to the Philippines. Ayn Rand’s “Pure Capitalism” will never work for in Capitalism there is no Political Accountability. What is not controlled is a threat. There should be regulation. I cannot imagine a world where everyone is a Randian. It would be chaos. Everyone will step on each other. Objectivism cannot be unevirsalized, in Kant’s view, according to his “Categorical Imperative,” it is not right, it is foolish in my view as well. She got carried away with her Soviet experience, that is why she got lost. Don’t get lost brother.
Vincent Cifra:
I hope you know what you’re talking about. Did you ever read any Ayn Rand books? You’re clearly dealing with or attacking a straw man here simply because you don’t have any idea of what Ayn Rand advocated for.
Your opening line is full of contradictions and undefined premises. You said: “Your Capitalism brought Oligarchy to the Philippines.” Do you know the proper concept of Capitalism? Do you know the definition of “oligarchy”. Oligarchy or even monopoly cannot exist in a truly capitalist society. I have thoroughly tackled the concept of capitalism here… https://fvdb.wordpress.com/advocacy-capitalism/
You may also attack this one if you want… https://fvdb.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/does-capitalism-produce-slavery-monopoly-unearned-wealth/
You said: “Ayn Rand’s “Pure Capitalism” will never work for in Capitalism there is no Political Accountability.”
I have discussed this issue a long time ago here… https://fvdb.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/salus-populi-est-suprema-lex-is-an-evil-concept/
I wrote: “The Philippines is a highly relativist society with its many traditions, ethnic values and culture, religion, and other relativist and non-reality-based social constructs. However, most social constructs in our society are against reality and the nature of man. Since our modern social culture is a conglomeration of various ethnic cultures and foreign cultures, most of which were imbibed from our Spanish, Japanese and American colonists, I argue that the sum of our cultural values has no definite identity. Some of you might argue that the Philippines is an ethnic society so free-market capitalism is not compatible with our culture. My answer is: get rid of those anti-man, anti-reality cultures because they are some of the chief reasons why this country is being left behind.”
So0 what works here? Socialism and fascism? These are the systems that characterize state controls, regulations and intervention.
Karl Marx’s evil, irrational idea led to the death of hundreds of millions of people in Soviet Russia and Maoist China. Is this what you want?
Meanwhile, Kant’s view led to the holocaust wherein millions of Jews and Europeans were murdered by the Nazis. It’s no surprise that Adolf Eichmann was a Kantian. Eichmann stated himself during his historic trial that he had always tried to abide by Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative. I suggest that you read Hannah Arendt’s book titled “Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil.”
I have tackled the philosophy of Kant in the following blogs:
In Defense of Truth: PART II – https://fvdb.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/in-defense-of-truth-part-ii/
No, They Can’t! – https://fvdb.wordpress.com/2010/03/23/no-they-cant/
I suggest that you read these:
On Ethics and Politics – https://fvdb.wordpress.com/2010/04/30/on-ethics-and-politics/
Ayn Rand Versus Immanuel Kant – https://fvdb.wordpress.com/2010/04/30/on-ethics-and-politics/
It’s a customary rule that before you try to attack someone, “know thy enemy.” That is, you should know where I’m coming from. In your case, you’re simply echoing the passe rhetoric and sophistry of the leftists and statists.
On your definition of Capitalism;
You got all of those from Ayn Rand’s “Virtue of Selfishness.” You must understand that the role of the government is to “protect” by means of all necessities, including force; this “force” includes all dimensions of it, including physical force. The government has the right to impose control for what is not controlled is a threat. Individual rights of owning properties must be regulated; if you really believe in Ayn Rand then you know that Ayn Rand defined that true Capitalism is that which is uncontrolled and unregulated Capitalism. – This is a threat, why? – Because this encourages the birth of exploitation. The Government must control Capitalism, this brings it to socialism. – (Read Chomsky and Naomi Klien’s “Disaster Capitalism” and understand Socialism; you’ll find that all your Stalin conceptions of Socialism is not Socialism, now they are the ones you can consider to have an insane logic and they are not Socialists, e.g. Stalin, Lenin, others)
You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about… Nice try. Read further articles here (https://fvdb.wordpress.com/advocacy-capitalism/) because you’re clearly aiming at a straw man. There’s no use dealing with you since you know very little about the topic…
Does Capitalism Produce Slavery, Monopoly, and Unearned Wealth?;
Yes, same as Stalinism, Leninism, Maoisim, and others, but not Socialism for Socialism is a politico-economic philosophy that entails control of the people on the means of production in accordance with democratic principles. In short, a government for the people, by the people, and for the people. Socialism is Democracy while Capitalism is Oligarchy. 🙂
On your discussion; “https://fvdb.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/salus-populi-est-suprema-lex-is-an-evil-concept/”
You said: “The Philippines is a highly relativist society with its many traditions, ethnic values and culture, religion, and other relativist and non-reality-based social constructs.” – The more that control should be established, thus, Capitalism will never really work for this nation. There has to be a vertical means of authority.
You said: “However, most social constructs in our society are against reality and the nature of man.” – But what is the nature of man?” – This is an invalid thought for even man’s nature is encapsulated in subjectivity. Read Thomas Aquinas, Aristotle, Xun Zi and Meng Zi. – There are many more but you can start with them.
You said: “Since our modern social culture is a conglomeration of various ethnic cultures and foreign cultures, most of which were imbibed from our Spanish, Japanese and American colonists, I argue that the sum of our cultural values has no definite identity.” – No definite identity; this show more the necessity of our society for control and centralization, – centralization and control are the goals of Socialism anchored in Democracy founded by Political Accountability – This rejects any form of dictatorship and individual exploitation.
. . . . . . . . . Now I can go further but this will take too long.
Try to argue better…
I respect you relative view on my skills in arguing. In my view, I would like to say the same due to concern. – Read more, be eclectic, then you will be able to argue better. 🙂
I have no more time in answering and addressing all the other issues raised. All I can hope for is that you open your mind in understanding Socialism. – A word of advice may be useful for you; Socialism, and Communism, for that matter are founded on the ideology of Dialectics. When you read Hegel and Mao Zedong, you will understand that structuralism and linear argumentation, logic that is; what you’re using is Aristotle’s system of logic, cannot usher a relatively complete understanding of Socialism and Communism. Dialectics and the Principle of Contradiction deny your “logic.” – This perhaps is the reason why you said that Socialists are encapsulated in illogicality (Note that Logic is never equal to justice and morality) – because you do not understand it. – That is its system of thought; Dialectics ‘Cicularity’. Don’t even think for a minute that life is linear, life is circular. You read Immanuel Kant I suppose, his antinomies will prove the Socialist Dialectics and the invalidity of your system of thought. (Note that your system of thought is just one view in looking at Socialism, there are many others. You will not understand Socialism if you confine yourself in your system of thought.) Well, in the internet, people usually have this logic that who ever gets the “last word” in an argumentation wins the argumentation. Well for them, this is a “Fallacy of Non Sequitor,” (this Fallacy, I know you know) – It does not follow that because one does not answer anymore then he is the defeated one. I have respect for your views brother, with this, I ask respect in return, please don’t address Socialist thoughts in an “Ad Hominem” manner. – Attack the concept not the character of the people viewing it, attack only Socialism not the Socialists, your supporting words for your arguments are enclosed in the thought of “Argumentum Ad Hominem.” – Refrain from doing this; this, in your system of thought, is illogical. Years have passed and the debate between Capitalism and Socialism is not yet over, perhaps it never will, this goes to show that an internet debate on it will definitely be endless as well if no one will cease to answer. – Thus, with pure respect to your authority in this page, I cease my case and hope that you see the light in Socialism; if you idolize Ninoy Aquino, then it would help if I inform you that he is an advocate of Socialism. 🙂
It’s a waste of time to deal with a half-wit parasitical leftist like you…
Your kind brother is what makes Capitalism a threat to society, your kind will definitely be one of those who will be lured in the temptation of exploitation. . . Thank you for strengthening my side on the issue. Know thy enemy indeed – Sun Zi.
Lol! Congratulations! You’ve just proved the title of this blog!
Please, can you PM me and tell me few more thinks about this, I am really fan of your blog…gets solved properly asap.
Hi, for some reason when I place your feed into google reader, it won?t work. Can you give me the RSS link just to be sure I?m using the most appropriate one?
Wonderful blog! I truly love how it? s easy on my eyes as well as the data are well written. I am wondering how I can be notified whenever a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your rss feed which need to do the trick! Have a nice day!
my God, i thought you were going to chip in with some decisive insght at the end there, not leave it
with ‘we leave it to you to decide’.
It sounds like you’re creating problems yourself by trying to solve this issue instead of looking at why
their is a problem in the first place
Hey! Would you mind if I share your blog with my facebook group? There’s a lot of folks that I think would really enjoy your content. Please let me know. Thank you
So where do you bash the socialists?
Seriosuly no actual argument here. In any case capitalism is bad, look what happened to usa
What happened to USA? I don’t think you know what you’re talking about… What happened to USA was caused by government intervention. Get your facts first before spouting more stupidity.