Skip to content

My Morality

What is my ethics or morality and why do I believe it is only for living on Earth?

A commenter nicknamed Charles asked me to comment on issues like capitalism, self-interest, the concepts of “Aryan way of thought, collectivism, and bigotry. Please click here for the commenter’s entire query. The following is my reply:

Hi Charles:

You have raised interesting points in your comment. Now let me try my best to deal with the matters you adduced seriatim. First, I have to tell you that I have no formal degree in philosophy, although I have learned through my own efforts to understand life and the concept of reality through reading, observation and the Aristotelian concept of induction. I adhere to the philosophy of Objectivism, a philosophy that can be summarized in the following manner:

  1. Metaphysics: Objective reality
  2. Epistemology: Reason
  3. Ethics: Self-interest
  4. Politics: Capitalism

I have to lay down these principles because they convey the fundamental premise of this essay. Your queries are focused on the critical questions I raised in my previous essay entitled the Philosophy of Academic Bigotry. I concluded that essay with the following questions:

Why is it that not a single individual honestly defends capitalism in this country?

Why is it that most favor the redistribution of wealth, government intervention and welfare statism?

Why is it good to consider the welfare of others and not yours?

Why is it that most people have been sold to the mantra of collective good, collective effort, common good, etc. when these abstractions have no exact, objective meaning at all but only seek the immolation of the good to the weak?

Why is taking things on faith considered a virtue?

Why is more importance given to faith than reason?”

Lest I be misunderstood, let me try to convert these abstractions into clear concretes. But first I would like to state that I am not pushing for what you call “completely neo-classical perspective” here (whatever that term means, because today most abstractions no longer have clear and concrete meanings, and I believe that this semantic corruption can effectively disrupt our understanding of reality.)

I would like address the first issue you raised. You said: “You are pushing that capitalism and (well I really can’t word it less harshly) self-interest is the way to go.” I see it fit to define my terms here according to Objectivist and Aristotelian concept of self-interest. Let me state here that Objectivism is based on the philosophy of Aristotle, although the former is more all-encompassing, more extensive, and that it cuts across different categories of fundamental abstractions like economics, politics, aesthetics, literature and even science. This means that Objectivism is a well-developed philosophy whose ethics is rational selfishness and whose principles are centered on the sanctity of human life and the primacy of the individual over the collective. Reality is superior to man’s consciousness, and this is the basic tenet of Objectivism.

I’m not surprised that most people in this country will find it hard and “harsh” to accept that man’s ethical standard is self-interest. Most universities today preach the opposite, telling students that we must live for others— that we must sacrifice ourselves to others, and that it is our duty to serve the welfare and good of others. We have an educational institution in this country that seeks to perpetuate this goal with its philosophy of “men and women for others.” The morality behind this philosophy is that of altruism. The meaning of altruism is not simply kindness or generosity toward other people. Altruism means that man must serve others and that it is his duty to satisfy and fulfill the welfare of others. This kind of morality is not simply immoral; it is evil at best. It means that man must put the interests of others above his own. Altruism demands that man must do the impossible. Read the rest of the essay here.

4 Comments leave one →
  1. October 19, 2009 3:38

    Reading this blog makes me glad that the ideas I am fighting for are still running strong across the entire continent. I have recently started an objectivist newsletter with a colleague of mine at my university, and seeing this as a possibility of what our small newsletter could accomplish is a great inspiration. Thank you for your hard work in the cause of destroying irrationality in our world.

    Colin MacDonald

  2. December 7, 2009 3:38

    The Highest Virtue:

    Ovi / Bookforum/Op-ed News/Newsblaze/others

    review: The Final Freedoms©free

    On the horizon is an approaching religious and cultural furore so contentious, any clash of civilizations may have to wait. On one side, a manuscript titled: The Final Freedoms, against all the gravitas religious tradition can bring to bear.

    The first wholly new interpretation for 2000 years of the moral teachings of Christ is on the web. Redefining all primary elements including Faith, the Word, Baptism, the Trinity and the Resurrection, this new interpretation questions the validity and origins of all Christian tradition; focusing specifically on marriage, love and human sexuality, it overturns all natural law ethics and theory. At stake is the credibility of several thousand years of religious history and moral teaching, and will certainly impact other fields of intellectual inquiry.

    What first appears a counter intuitive and utterly preposterous challenge to the religious status quo is worth closer examination; it carries within its pages ideas both subtle and sublime, what the theological history of religion either ignored, were unable to imagine or dismissed as impossible. An error of presumption which could now leave ‘tradition’ staring into the abyss and humble all secular, atheist speculation. This new teaching has nothing whatsoever to do with any existing religious conception known to history. It is unique in every respect. What science and religion have agreed was not possible, has now become all too inevitable.

    Using a synthesis of scriptural material from the Old and New Testaments, the Apocrypha , The Dead Sea Scrolls, The Nag Hammadi Library, and some of the worlds great poetry, it describes and teaches a single moral LAW, a single moral principle, and offers the promise of its own proof; one in which the reality of God responds directly to an act of perfect faith with a individual intervention into the natural world; correcting human nature by a change in natural law, altering biology, consciousness and human ethical perception beyond all natural evolutionary boundaries. Intended to be understood metaphorically, where ‘death’ is ignorance and ‘Life’ is knowledge, this experience, personal encounter of transcendent power and moral purpose is the ‘Resurrection’, and justification for faith, providing a new, active moral foundation to reason itself.

    Here then is the first ever viable religious conception capable of leading reason, by faith, to observable consequences which can be tested and judged. This new teaching delivers the first ever religious claim of insight into the human condition, that meets the Enlightenment criteria of verifiable and ‘extraordinary’ evidence based truth embodied in action. For the first time in history, however unexpected, the world must now measure for itself, the reality of a new moral tenet, not of human intellectual origin, offering access by faith, to absolute proof for its belief.

    This is ‘religion’ without any of the conventional trappings of tradition. An individual, spiritual, virtue-ethical conception, independent of all cultural perception, contained within a single moral command and single Law that finds it’s expression of obedience within a new covenant of marriage. It requires no institutional framework or hierarchy, no churches or priest craft, no scholastic theological rational, dogma or doctrine and ‘worship’ requires only conviction, faith and the necessary measure of self discipline to accomplish a new, single, moral imperative and the integrity and fidelity to the new reality.

    If confirmed and there appears both the means and a growing, concerted effort to test and authenticate this material, this will represent a paradigm change in the moral and intellectual potential of human nature itself; untangling and resolving the greatest questions of human existence: consciousness, meaning, suffering, free will and evil. And at the same time addressing the most profound problems of our age.

    While every day, from every television screen, newspaper, radio and web, the limitations of mankind are becoming both obvious and ominous by the failure to successfully address and resolve the most pressing problems facing the modern world, threatening humanity and the earth itself, with this revelation, we are offered way out.

    Providing the ‘means to ends’ this new teaching is asking humanity, choose the future you prefer? The status quo, where existing religious tradition, mired in its own corruption, hypocrisy and contradiction offers little but divisiveness and its own pretensions, and politics offering only the growing chaos of more war, terrorism, conflict, environmental degradation, natural disaster, plague and pandemic, spin and whitewash, economic turmoil and sectarianism. Or learning to comprehend that human nature and natural reason, a prisoner to its evolutionary root, exists within ethical limits, and by taking new personal and moral responsibility, in a single change of mind and conduct, by faith, transcend those limits and blow the status quo strait to hell.

    Trials of this new teaching are open to all and under way in many countries, colloquial evidence from discussion forums already suggest confirmations are taking place. For those individuals who can imagine outside the historical cultural box, with the moral courage to learn something new, and test this for themselves, to stand against the stream of fashionable thought and spin, an intellectual and moral revolution is already under way, where hope meets reality and the ‘impossible’ becomes inevitable, with the most potent Non Violent Direct Action any human being can take to advance peace, justice, change and progress.

    Published [at the moment] only on the web, a typeset manuscript of this new teaching is available as a free [1.4meg] PDF download from a variety of sites including:

  3. May 9, 2010 3:38

    Great points! I will be checking back here often!

  4. October 23, 2010 3:38

    You got a really useful blog I have been here reading for about half an hour. I am a newbie and your post is valuable for me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: