‘Innocence of Muslims’: Another Pallywood Movie on YouTube?
It was the most condemned anti-Islam film so far despite the fact that hundreds, or even thousands, of quality films were produced and shown in the past. The Obama administration blamed the film and its still ‘unknown’ creators for the spate of killings, violence and protests across the Middle East since September 11, the 11th anniversary of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
In the Philippines, several groups of outraged Muslims demanded that YouTube take down the anti-Islam film and that the national government limit free speech in favor of their religion. Only if they knew the truth behind this controversial film.
Who actually created the film? Was it created by a christian extremist with Jewish connections? Or: was it funded, produced and uploaded by Muslim terrorists?
Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the creator of “Innocence of Muslims”, has been described by the liberal media as “an extremist Christian in the United States”. The uber-liberal Huffington Post reported that the man had “connections among Southern California’s right-wing Christian organizations”. What is really obvious is that Nakoula presented himself to the media as a ‘christian’ who “attended services at the Coptic Orthodox Church in Los Angeles”. According to this Al Jazeera report, “the church’s Bishop Serapion initially said none of his priests recognised the fraudster as a congregant. The bishop later told the AP he confirmed with a priest in Bellflower, California, that Nakoula had once gone to the parish but had not been to services in a long time.”
Court records show that Nakoula is a great pretender who used many names and aliases, Nicola Bacily, Robert Bacily, Erwin Salameh and others. He also claimed that he knew ‘Sam Bacile’, a 52-year-old Israeli-American real-estate developer who described the religion of Islam as a “cancer” and claimed that the anti-Islam trashy movie had been funded by Jewish donors to the tune of $5 million.
What I’d like you to do is CONNECT THE DOTS! That Nakoula deliberately portrayed himself as a Coptic christian ‘extremist’ with Jewish or Zionist connections. This picture shows an Islam versus Zionism story. For what could be more provocative than a Jewish or a Jew-connected christian extremist who produced or created an anti-Islam film? This is actually a good plot story for a detective Hollywood movie.
Now, Nakoula is in jail for allegedly violating the terms of probation on his 2010 conviction.
But here’s one thing that the mainstream media did not tell you: the real, actual personal life of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula– his family in Egypt, his educational background, his friends, connections, etc.
Fortunately, this was all revealed by Walid Shoebat, a fomer PLO terrorist and Muslim Brotherhood member, in his latest blog titled “Innocence of Muslims was made by terrorists”.
Here’s an excerpt of Shoebat’s latest expose:
Court documents reveal that Nakoula Bacile Nakoula, producer of the movieInnocence of Muslims, partnered in a scheme with Eiad Salameh, my first cousin.
Eiad is a Muslim terror supporter and is not an Egyptian Copt.
He comes from Beit Sahour, Bethlehem and is well known by the FBI and the Arab community as a conduit for Middle Easterners who can obtain authentic, legitimate identifications, from passports to credit cards that include many nationalities. He then places these forms of identification into the hands of dubious characters that are not the real identity.
In fact, I revealed Eiad Salameh way before this whole fiasco erupted—in 2008and the first reporting on the connection between Eiad and Nakoula was revealedon September 14th, 2012 by the Smoking Gun, which published court documents that prove these two were connected in 2009, as part of a major financial fraud scheme.
The narrative that circulates the media fails to address crucial questions about the mystery of this film.
For example, to date, no one has stepped forward or can confirm for certain that whoever holds an identity by the name of Nakoula Bacile Nakoula is even that man. After all, he held several identifications, including Muslim names. He could have easily presented a valid I.D. when he was arrested, yet he was likely not the man on that I.D.
Shoebat theorized that if an Egyptian man is behind the anti-Muslim film that angered over a billion of Muslims, then it would be very easy to trace his entire family in Egypt. Why did the mainstream media fail to report these
very basic facts about the most hated man in the Muslim world?
From Shoebat’s blog article:
In the Middle East, you are known by your clan. Yet, Egypt cannot produce neither this man’s family or his background?
Besides, why would Nakoula – who claims to be a religious Coptic activist – have extensive connections with Eiad, a man who I know hates Copts and is well-known to be among the best schemers the Middle East produced and has contacts with terror networks?
This terror connect is not devoid of evidence. The Daily Beast reported on Nakoula’s arrest:
The bust came around the time the feds were launching Operation Mountain Express, which would become a huge investigation into pseudoephedrine-dealing involving numerous people of a Middle Eastern background. The authorities initially insisted there were no links to terrorism, but suddenly switched and decided that a chunk of the money was going to Hizbullah.
Thus, Shoebat makes the conclusion that “the Eiad Nakoula connection was likely terror-related”. There is a need to stress that Nakoula has been judicially proved to be a great impersonator or impostor. He once disguised himself as an Israeli Jew, “a thing Eiad also did for years and fraudulently holds an authentic Israeli passport”. Shoebat writes.
To date, no one has produced proof to authenticate Nakoula. Yet, evidence shows with 100% certainty that both my cousin Eiad and Nakoula had multiple, fraudulent identities as we showed in our detailed report, which includes valid court records, a U.S. Trustee report, credit reports and our correspondence with Canadian intelligence.
How is it possible that these two strange bedfellows would snuggle up together? On the one hand, we have an Egyptian-Coptic-anti-Muslim-activist-fundamentalist-Christian turned Meth-dealer and on the other hand, we have a Muslim-Palestinian scam-artist-terrorist.
Some might counter that these two only had a fling. After all, Nakoula was simply a runner for Eiad in 2009.
What has never been disclosed until now is that the two were linked for at least a decade, from year 2000 through a bank fraud relationship in 2009.
Nakoula had used the name “P.J Tobacco” and Eiad was linked to a tobacco smuggling operation into Syria in 2001 by using a fictitious name (A & M Trading) as revealed in the U.S. Trustee report in 2001.
Nakoula used M & A Trading in 2009 with his pseudoephedrine dealings.
But what were Nakoula’s motives? Shoebat further writes:
He continued to state that he was an author of several anti-Islam books (written in Arabic) but refused to give the titles of his books.
Yet, if court documents give his legal name as Nakoula Bacile Nakoula, I found no books under that name. Nothing – and neither was anyone able to produce any.
The media’s narrative has nothing and this supposed Nakoula was proven a liar a hundred times over.
Yet, the media purports that the man is a Christian activist Copt. All of this man’s claims have been proven to be lies.
However, this one is believed?
Even what his friend stated to the court, that Nakoula is “a God-fearing man whose first priority is his family” contradicts what he said in Arabic. He is not interested in Christianity or Judaism and is possibly a Muslim.
So who funded the film? Nakoula claimed that he produced the film with money ($50,000 to $60,000) that came from his wife’s family in Egypt.
None of this has been proven.
What has been proven is that he embezzled millions with Eiad. The money must have come from these scandalous operations, which our government finally admitted is linked to terrorist activity.
Who ever made this film, claimed Jews funded him and that he was Copt. Obviously, this was intended to do harm to his real enemies — Israel and the Copts.
Both Copts and Israel are Eiad’s ardent enemies. This is indisputable.
Now, to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that the feds were complacent…
What actually motivated the film’s creators and producers? Was it to provoke Muslims worldwide on September 11?
I strongly agree with what this commenter said:
“I have seen the portion of the film, “The Innocence of the Muslims” on youtube, and have come to my own conclusion. I believe this film is a false flag operation. I do not believe that this amateurish film was made by a Jewish person, or a Christian, but rather, this was made by a muslim agent provocateur, designed to cast conservative Christians and Jews who are opposing the global muslim jihad in a bad light. There are already many excellent films and documentaries out there that have chronicled the barbaric acts of Muhammad and his band of thugs, as well as his pedophilia with his nine year old wife, who was six when he married her and he was in his fifties. No responsible Christian or Jew in the anti-jihad camp would ever have put together such a trashy, poorly documented, poorly executed film as this.”
Is this the greatest scam in 2012? Is the controversial film another work of Palliwood? You be the judge! Taqiyya must be at work here.