Skip to content

A Friendly Advice to a Dimwit

April 22, 2011

Here’s my advice to a dimwit who wrote this hilarious blog: The Intellectual Anthill of Objectivism. Some people have been very

What do you call someone who simply parroted some people's BS? BS still...

What do you call someone who simply parroted some people's BS? BS still...

busy doing some crappy college research work after I published this blog: In Defense of Absolute Rights and Free Speech Against Absolute Ignorance. This reminds me of a friend who said this: “If don’t have enough brain cells to refute it, better deal with trivialities…” Very true indeed!

———————————————–

This is getting funnier. This blog should be called Context-Drop Blog. Well, that’s what you get when you’re intellectually dishonest and lazy. Whatever you babbled on here does not represent AR’s views. I can’t even recognize them. That’s called strawman fallacy. I suggest a better way to attack her views. Try google Ayn Rand and Michael Shermer + Michael Prescott. These guys claimed they were former objectivists. You will surely get good materials for your blog.

This reminds me of someone who had to commit plagiarism just to attack me online. Well, this one is better, I think lol! Here’s what I’m talking about… The Highly Appalling Plagiarism of the Filipino Free-farters

FYI, this is just a piece of shit compared to the more honest Ayn Rand-bash articles that I debunked online. You’re free to tour my blogsite. At least those people had the guts to claim they read her work. As for you, you simply did a little bit of research and worked your little peanut. A non-critical thinker had to rely on some people’s BS. That’s what dimwits do.

That’s what Ilda did to her hilarious blog. Did you see how I debunked it? Now you can never react to it without resorting to trivialities. Isn’t that funny? She doesn’t even know what she’s talking about. Well, only intellectual people and people who have adequate knowledge of the law could understand the many errors in her fallacy-riddled blog.

Sorry but to my standards, that’s simply a bad research… Do it better next time.

Here’s what I learned from Ayn Rand:

“Ayn Rand taught me the cardinal value of honesty- first honesty with one’s self, and second honesty with others. This is consistent with her virtue of selfishness. A person who is not honest with his own self cannot be honest with others. Before one takes on any issue, one has to take upon himself to study the matters involved. One has to have an adequate knowledge of an issue before one can make his own moral or intellectual judgment. This is the reason why I only deal with issues that I am very much familiar with. Familiarity with or having sufficient knowledge of any issue or matter saves one’s self from committing any act of dishonesty or betrayal of one’s self, such as lying, plagiarism, smearing, and the like.

“In effect, she taught me not to rely on and use baseless and unfounded accusations against anybody. She taught me to seek evidence and proof first before making a moral judgment. Any smear or accusation not founded on concrete, solid evidence is a zero; it’s nothing but an anti-intellectual, anti-self mechanism designed to smear and discredit any person or entity. If you blackened the reputation of anybody by using baseless, unfounded claims and assertions, it is only your own self that you had betrayed. What does a dishonest person get from spreading false, ill-founded stories? The answer is artificial happiness or satisfaction, thus smearing is a cunning way to deceive one’s self and to fake reality.”

The Left’s Endless Smears Against Ayn Rand

Advertisements
14 Comments leave one →
  1. April 23, 2011 3:38

    For an absolutist, you sure have a rather quaint habit of living by the words and thoughts of other people. Tsk tsk. I doubt there is even the smallest iota of an original thought in that pointed head of yours. 😀

    • April 23, 2011 3:38

      So you have an original thought, you who couldn’t argue properly? What do you mean by original thought, dimwit? Tell your comrade to do his research better. Oh, you hate me for taking on the college paper research of one of your comrades… Hmmmm…

    • April 23, 2011 3:38

      I could explain original thought to you, but the concept of originality will probably be lost in someone who hasn’t experienced having an original thought. Too bad. 😀

      Get Real Philippines!

      • April 23, 2011 3:38

        Well, to some deluded dimwits, that’s possible. Observe that most deluded people have original thoughts. You’re one of them. Is that what you, GRP people, do? Well, I’m sorry but one of your writers just committed lots of logical fallacies and an act of “copying” as well. If you resent that, I can only do so much… Next time, better do “better” research… OK? I know, you don’t have any intellectual ammunition to refute my blog as I did to one of your fallacy-riddled blogs…

      • April 23, 2011 3:38

        What’s there in your blog to refute? All I see are regurgitations of your Ayn Rand’s writing. As I said, earlier, you lack any sort of original thought — the perfect Randroid kung baga. Your boss will be proud. 😀

      • April 23, 2011 3:38

        Well, that only means you couldn’t… Your presence here and your stupid antics prove that. Grow up.

  2. April 23, 2011 3:38

    @ Dimwit benign0:

    I deleted your comments. Now that’s absolute. They’re gone. That’s also my absolute right because my right is not limited by anything whatsoever- and this blogsite is my private property… Let’s see if you can send the thought-control and anti-free speech police to arrest me. Can you? Why? Because I never violated any of your crappy right! Do you understand that concept? You can howl all you can. You can even leap to your death and the result would be ABSOLUTE: dead or alive! 😉

    • Kurtee Dean Pogi permalink
      April 23, 2011 3:38

      what a classic response, man! haha! you didn’t feed a troll. asteeg! enjoyed it.

    • Kurtee Dean Pogi permalink
      April 23, 2011 3:38

      it means: don’t feed trolls lol!

  3. GabbyD permalink
    April 23, 2011 3:38

    rockstar? saan? 🙂

  4. Rhee permalink
    April 23, 2011 3:38

    I enjoyed the comment more than the blog post. 😀

  5. April 24, 2011 3:38

    Ayos ba? How do you like my brilliant feature of you on my blog? Check it out here. 😀

  6. April 24, 2011 3:38

    By deleting posts by your critics, you proved so many things:

    1) Ilda’s blog was correct about the limits of “freedom of speech.”

    2) You are a hypocrite for not following your support for freedom of speech.

    3) You know nothing else beyond Ayn Rand.

    4) You are scared that your readers will finally realise that you are nothing but a WANNABE lawyer.

    5) Most of all, you are scared of criticism from others.

    Next time try to get to know who you are dealing with before you launch your attack, ok?

    Ta-ta!

    • April 24, 2011 3:38

      Same comment with same answer and same sockpuppet:

      Lol. Not even an iota of argument. I would have been gladder if those trolls defend Ilda. I’m dealing with people who don’t know what they’re talking about. Next please…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: